What the Heck’s an “Overseas Contingency Operation?”

It’s the newer, nicer “War on Terror.”

From The Rosett Report,

I wish I were making this up — but no such luck. The Washington Post reports that the Obama administration has renamed the Global War on Terror. Apparently it is no longer a war, nor is terror worth mentioning. It is now the “Overseas Contingency Operation.”

Or, I suppose, if you want something a little snappier, the OCO.

If we could only persuade America’s enemies to use language like that, we’d win. Overcome with polysyllabic confusion, they’d spend most of their time wondering who they are fighting, or why.

As it is, my heart goes out to the brave American men and women fighting on the front lines of a very real war, who are now risking their lives not in the Global War on Terror, or World War IV, but in the Overseas Contingency Operation. Is that what Obama will still be calling it after the next attack on America’s shores?

Over at Jihad Watch, Robert Spencer does a neat summing up:

“And so now we are engaged in a great Overseas Contingency Operation, testing whether that nation or any nation so conceived and so dedicated can long endure. And be assured: if the Overseas Contingency Operatives succeed in pulling off another Contingency Operation on American soil on the scale of 9/11, or more than one, we will indeed be sorely tested — and utterly unprepared to meet the multifaceted cultural, military, political, and spiritual challenge the enemy presents.”

Published in: on March 27, 2009 at 6:17 pm  Leave a Comment  

The DREAM Act- Making In-State Tuition for Illegals Reality

Wisconsin Governor Jim Doyle’s 2009-2011 budget includes his 4th try at passing in-state college tuition for illegal aliens.  Background here.

The way it stands, the provision would be in violation of federal law.

But here it comes- again- to save the day!

The DREAM Act.

Sound familiar?  That’s because last year’s version of the Dream Act fell a few votes short in the Senate.

This bi-partisan bill would give states the rights to extend tuition benefits to illegals.

This would remove Gov. Doyle’s pesky barricade to putting the screws to the Badger state once again.

Michelle Malkin has more on the Dream Act here.

Published in: on March 27, 2009 at 5:47 pm  Leave a Comment  

Congressional BCS Intervention is a Great Idea

bcs

This story has been brewing this week and reminds me of the congressional hearings on MLB steroid use.

Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) is pushing a Judiciary subcommittee to hold hearings on the problematic play-off system (or non-system) in NCAA Division I football.

As if that’s ever a good- or legal- use of time on Capitol Hill.

But at least it doesn’t involve raising taxes.  In fact, it doesn’t involve messing up much of anything, because the NCAA’s Bowl Championship Series can’t get much worse.

If it takes their time away from pushing amnesty, Obama’s budget, higher taxes, universal health care, cap-and-trade, card check, then Congress should spend every possible moment on solving this pressing problem.  Or at least so Utah doesn’t get screwed again.

Flashback:

Judicial anti-trust hearings on these same issues were led by then-Senator Joe Biden back in 2003.

Just another argument for government’s effective touch.

Published in: on March 27, 2009 at 5:24 pm  Leave a Comment  

“Do you trust Congress with health care after AIG?”

From Hot Air’s Ed Morrissey,

Conservatives for Patients Rights formed earlier this year to push back against the expected nationalization of health care from Barack Obama.  Rick Scott, who built two health-care provider companies, asks if Americans want to trust their health-care service to the 535 people who couldn’t find the AIG bonus exemption in the stimulus bill they passed:

It’s an effective ad, and a good question. What will be the Outrage Du Jour when the federal government takes over the health-care industry? How many doctors and nurses will the populist mob chase out of clinics and hospitals through ignorance and hostility? And how many of these 535 people will really read the enabling acts for nationalization?

Published in: on March 27, 2009 at 5:08 pm  Leave a Comment  

“GIVE/SERVE Act Updates”

From Michelle Malkin,

Quin Hilyer takes a closer look at the creepy national service expansion plans in today’s DC Examiner, and posts an update on one troublesome provision:

Between being first officially “reported” to the House and being voted on by the full House, bill managers stripped one whole section of the measure that created a Congressional Commission on Civil Service, thus removing the section that contained the language cited above concerning “a workable, fair, and reasonable mandatory service requirement for all able young people” and a possible requirement for “all individuals in the United States” to perform such service. The section could be restored during the Senate-House conference committee meeting. A new, separate bill containing that language has since been introduced in the House.

Alas, every last cent of the $6 billion in boondoggle spending is still there.

Also this afternoon: An amendment from Sen. Vitter to block ACORN from receiving GIVE/SERVE funds was tabled and ultimately blocked, with an early vote count of 53-43.

Sigh: Senate passes the $6 billion boondoggle, 79-19.

Published in: on March 26, 2009 at 9:12 pm  Comments (1)  

“Here it is, Mr. President”

The House Republicans unveiled their alternative to Obama’s budget Thursday.

19 pages of practically nothing.

“Here it is, Mr. President”

From House Republican Leader John Boehner,

Republican leaders in the U.S. House of Representatives today unveiled “The Republican Road to Recovery,” a document that outlines Republican solutions on the budget and other major issues facing the American people.  The GOP Road to Recovery plan was unveiled this morning on Capitol Hill just hours after Democrats rammed President Obama’s bloated FY 2010 budget through the House Budget Committee, building on the six budget principles that were outlined for President Obama last week by House Republican leaders.

What a lame excuse for a press conference.

Why in the heck would Republicans trot out a 19-page pamphlet on their ideas? It’s an embarrassment.

Aside from a few tax rate changes, there’s no numbers and no details.

Just a teaser and a promise for more details “next week.”  This is the same put-off job we heard from Obama on his budget and Tim Geithner on his Treasury plans.

Get your plan together firstThen roll it out.

At least now we know where McCain’s presidential campaign staff went to work.

Republicans must do better.   After all, it’s their game to lose right now.

Published in: on March 26, 2009 at 8:22 pm  Leave a Comment  

Will Rahm Give Back the Money?

rahm-emanuel-120707From Hot Air’s busy man Ed Morrissey,

Capitol Hill exploded in outrage this month when AIG paid retention bonuses to the employees it brought on board to rescue the company from the shoals.  What about people in high government office who profited from unethical behavior during the period when the damage got done?  Congress could start demanding refunds from those people — like, say, Barack Obama’s Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel:

Before its portfolio of bad loans helped trigger the current housing crisis, mortgage giant Freddie Mac was the focus of a major accounting scandal that led to a management shake-up, huge fines and scalding condemnation of passive directors by a top federal regulator.

One of those allegedly asleep-at-the-switch board members was Chicago’s Rahm Emanuel—now chief of staff to President Barack Obama—who made at least $320,000 for a 14-month stint at Freddie Mac that required little effort. …

The board met no more than six times a year. Unlike most fellow directors, Emanuel was not assigned to any of the board’s working committees, according to company proxy statements. Immediately upon joining the board, Emanuel and other new directors qualified for $380,000 in stock and options plus a $20,000 annual fee, records indicate.

On Emanuel’s watch, the board was told by executives of a plan to use accounting tricks to mislead shareholders about outsize profits the government-chartered firm was then reaping from risky investments. The goal was to push earnings onto the books in future years, ensuring that Freddie Mac would appear profitable on paper for years to come and helping maximize annual bonuses for company brass.

Congress had plenty of venom to unleash on AIG execs this month over some contractually-obligated retention bonuses.  Why not go after some of the people really responsible for the collapse — the people who sat on boards while cooking the numbers, fooling investors, and evading auditors?  When will Congress pass a bill asking Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae board members during this period to return the ill-gotten gains they received from perpetrating a Ponzi scheme with government backing?

Well, that’s the answer right there.  Too many of the people in Congress who vented outrage over retention bonuses not only approved of the Ponzi schemes at the GSEs, they colluded in creating them.  Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, et al have little room to castigate Rahm Emanuel for merely enacting what they created.  And that, of course, is the root of the hypocrisy.

Published in: on March 26, 2009 at 8:14 pm  Leave a Comment  

66% Think Obama Will Break Tax Promise

From Rasmussen Reports,

Two-thirds of U.S. voters (66%) think President Obama is likely to raise taxes on people who less than $250,000 per year. That figure includes 47% who say he is Very Likely to do so.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that just 18% doubt that will happen.

Democrats, not surprisingly, are more confident that the president will keep his word. But, 46% of Democratic voters say he is somewhat likely to raise taxes on those with lower income. That view is shared by 89% of Republicans and 68% of unaffiliated voters.

Published in: on March 26, 2009 at 8:05 pm  Leave a Comment  

Obama Extols Universal Health Care

From Hot Air’s Ed Morrissey,

If you want a peek at the direction Barack Obama will take health care, or at least where he would like to take it, check out this moment from an otherwise dull, dreary “virtual town hall”.  Obama extols the virtues of single-payer systems in Europe and Canada while lamenting the “legacy” that keeps America from its nationalized destiny:

Obama’s right about the “historical accident” of employer based care, from which Obama obviously drew the wrong lesson.  Government intervention in markets — in this case, the labor market — produces strange and sometimes problematic results.  This was the very issue that John McCain wanted to address in his plans to make employer-financed health insurance taxable income while providing a balancing refundable that would have disconnected insurance from employment and created a new market for individual — and portable — plans.  Obama and the Democrats misrepresented McCain’s plans, and then turned around this month and suggested they might co-opt the McCain approach now.

As for his description of Canada and “England” as places where one just walks in and gets treatment, perhaps Obama should talk to more Canadians and “English”.  Most have to wait months for tests and treatments.  The British have a chronic lack of dentists and transplant surgeons, just to name two specialties, because of the lack of compensation for specializations.  Both have a healthy “health tourism” outflow of patients to countries that allow for free-market health care.  Most people in the systems that Obama hails would laugh outright at the notion that they get health care on demand.

Maybe Obama should do more research on Canada and “England”.


Published in: on March 26, 2009 at 7:54 pm  Leave a Comment  

“The New California Gold Rush”

From NBC Los Angelesgold_rush

Within an hour of downtown Los Angeles, people are seeking that one sure commodity.

“I’m here to find gold,” said Kevin Brown.

Geologists estimate that during the gold rush of 1849 in California, about 80 percent of the gold was never found. Today, with the price of gold soaring and the economy falling, the idea of panning, digging or diving for precious metal has become serious business.

“There’s definitely gold nuggets down in the bottom here,” Brown said. “Just a matter of getting 30 feet down lower than any old timer or modern prospector has done.”

But prospecting is not easy money. It takes time and a lot of hard work. John Gurney, who came out to California from the East Coast to find gold, was able to pull out about $35,000 worth of gold nuggets over a couple of months. Then there was a dry spell — and now, John is at it again.“Some days you sit here and make two cents. Some days you make a couple of hundred dollars. I had one good day and made about $10,000,” Gurney said.

California’s second gold rush has also created at least one recession-proof business.

Keene Engineering of Chatsworth, Calif., makes the equipment you need to find gold — from plastic pans to large commercial rigs. The owners say their business has doubled.

“There are hundreds of people coming in here to buy gold pans and sluice boxes, and take their chances of finding gold in the local hills and mountains,” said sales manager Patrick Keene. “There is a whole new flood of prospectors and miners.”

Full story, with video, here.

Published in: on March 25, 2009 at 10:46 pm  Leave a Comment  
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.